<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Business &#38; Employment Law Blog &#187; legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/tag/legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Northern California&#039;s Source for Business and Employment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Small Business Owners May be Eligible for Health Care Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post by Sarah Needleman of the Wall Street Journal, she points out a new tax credit that may be available to small business owners who pay for health insurance for their employees:
Uncle Sam wants small-business  owners to take notice of a new health-care tax credit &#8212; one of the  first provisions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In this post by Sarah Needleman of the Wall Street Journal, she points out a new tax credit that may be available to small business owners who pay for health insurance for their employees:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Uncle Sam wants small-business  owners to take notice of a new health-care tax credit &#8212; one of the  first provisions of the recently enacted health-reform law to go into  effect.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Last week, the Internal Revenue Service  announced that it&#8217;s sending postcards to more than four million small  businesses urging them to check if they qualify for the tax break. It&#8217;s  being offered in two phases, with the first worth up to 35% of  qualifying businesses&#8217; premium health-care costs for tax years 2010  through 2013. The rate increases to 50% in 2014. The maximum length of  potential coverage for qualifying employers is six taxable years: four  years under the first phase and two years under the second.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In general, to be eligible for the tax credit, businesses must cover  at least 50% of the cost of health-care coverage for some of their  workers, employ fewer than the equivalent of 25 full-time workers and  pay average annual wages below $50,000. The IRS says the tax break is  designed to encourage smaller businesses – which are not mandated by  2014 to provide health care, unlike companies with more than 50  employees – to offer health coverage to their low- and moderate-income  workers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Tammy Rostov, owner of Rostov&#8217;s Coffee &amp; Tea in Richmond, Va.,  says she received the IRS&#8217;s postcard and expects her small retail  business to be eligible for the credit. She offers health coverage to  her five full-time employees and pays 100% of the premium, an amount  that she says has increased by more than 200% over the past six years.  She describes the tax credit as a welcome relief. &#8220;It&#8217;s a step in the  right direction,&#8221; she says.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But other qualifying business owners are less enthusiastic, arguing  that the tax break won&#8217;t make a significant impact on their bottom  lines.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Pascal Helou, owner of Globotron LLC, a technology-consulting company  in New York, says affording health insurance for his three employees is  a non-issue given that he&#8217;s struggling these days just to stay in  business. Since 2007, he says sales have declined 30% every year and his  firm now has four clients, down from 15.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;For my business, this type of tax credit will not make a  difference,&#8221; says Mr. Helou, adding that he has yet to receive the IRS&#8217;s  postcard about it. &#8220;The real issue is the amount of business we&#8217;re  getting. Nobody&#8217;s willing to spend money&#8221; on technology-consulting  services.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Meanwhile, there are also some entrepreneurs who don&#8217;t believe the  government should provide financial incentives for small businesses to  offer health coverage to workers in the first place.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Jim Fab, owner of Fab Electric Inc., an electrical contractor  business in Gaithersburg, Md., falls into this camp. Providing health  insurance and other benefits to his 18 employees, he says, is &#8220;hopefully  what separates me from the electrical contractor that doesn&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some small businesses appear to be left without any government aide  under the new piece of health-reform legislation. These include  organizations with between 25 and 50 employees and ones with less than  25 employees but payrolls that average $50,000 or more.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Tracy Betts, says her Springfield, Va., Web-design business, Balance  Technology Group Inc., doesn&#8217;t qualify for the credit. While she employs  the equivalent of eight full-time workers, their salaries&#8217; average  $71,000. &#8220;For me, it&#8217;s all about the programmers, and I can&#8217;t hire  anyone for less than $90,000 (in annual pay),&#8221; she says.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Ms. Betts says a year and half ago she told her staff she could only  afford to offer them either health-care coverage or a retirement-savings  plan with a matching contribution from the company. All but one chose  the latter benefit, she says.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Small Business Owners May be Eligible for Health Care Tax Credit</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COBRA Update, Again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/04/cobra-update-again/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/04/cobra-update-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Advice & Counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Leave & Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Labor Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment benefits legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redding Red Bluff Chico Employment Law Attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed in my earlier posts  here, congress has repeatedly extended the benefits to employees under COBRA. And now, for the third ime, the COBRA premium subsidy program has been extended, this time through May 31, 2010, under the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (Act). The key provisions of the Act include:

The extension of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">As discussed in my earlier posts  <a href="http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=157" target="_blank">here</a>, congress has repeatedly extended the benefits to employees under COBRA. And now, for the third ime, the COBRA premium subsidy program has been extended, this time through May 31, 2010, under the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (Act). The key provisions of the Act include:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>The extension of the      eligibility period for the COBRA subsidy through May 31, 2010.</li>
<li>A new special election period      and related notice requirement for individuals who experience a qualifying      event that is related to a termination of employment on or after April 1,      2010, and before April 15, 2010.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The excerpts below are from an article posted by the law firm of Drinker Biddle, a large national law firm.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Special Election Period</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A health plan must extend a special COBRA election period to an individual who experienced an involuntary termination of employment on or after April 1, 2010, and prior to April 15, 2010, and who would be an “assistance eligible individual” (AEI) but who does not have a COBRA election in effect on April 15, 2010. The special election period runs from April 15, 2010, through the date 60 days after the Notice of Special Election Period is provided to that individual.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Note about effective date of COBRA subsidy.</em> Although not specifically addressed in the Act, due to the short, 15-day gap between the expiration of the COBRA subsidy on March 31, 2010, and enactment of the Act, we believe that an individual’s COBRA subsidy becomes effective as of the first day of COBRA coverage if he or she elects coverage during the special election period.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Notice of Special Election Period</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the case of any individual who experienced a qualifying event related to a termination of employment on or after April 1, 2010, and prior to April 15, 2010, a plan administrator must provide the general COBRA notice, including a description of the availability of premium reduction in the case of a qualifying event that is an involuntary termination of employment, within 60 days of enactment of the Act (i.e., by June 14, 2010). If the plan administrator has already distributed the general COBRA notice to such individuals, then the plan administrator may simply supplement it with an additional notice describing the extension of the availability of premium reduction with respect to involuntary terminations through May 31, 2010, and the special election period.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Note about the notice requirement.</em> The Act is not clear on whether this notice applies only to AEIs, or to any individual who has a qualifying event related to a termination of employment, whether voluntary or involuntary, during the period April 1, 2010, through April 14, 2010. The more conservative approach is for a plan administrator to provide the special election notice to any individual who experienced a qualifying event related to a termination of employment on or after April 1, 2010, and prior to April 15, 2010, in order to notify all individuals who may potentially be eligible for the COBRA subsidy, including those who an employer may have incorrectly classified as voluntarily terminated.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>A Reminder – Expansion of Assistance Eligible Individuals</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Under ARRA, only individuals who experienced a qualifying event that was an employee’s involuntary termination of employment could become AEIs and take advantage of the COBRA premium subsidy. The Temporary Extension Act of 2010 expanded the premium subsidy to include as a qualifying event for purposes of the subsidy, a reduction of hours that occurred at any time on or after September 1, 2008, and is followed by an involuntary termination of employment that occurs on or after March 2, 2010 (and before June 1, 2010). Individuals who experience a qualifying event that falls under this expanded definition and are otherwise eligible AEIs (Reduced Hours AEIs) will be eligible for the COBRA subsidy beginning with the first day of the first period of coverage for which the individual is a Reduced Hours AEI. The Reduced Hours AEI’s maximum continuation coverage period is determined as if the individual had elected COBRA when initially eligible due to the reduction of hours.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Action Items</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Plan sponsors and administrators should consider the following immediate action items:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><em>Notices</em>. Plan administrators should update their COBRA notices      and other plan communications to include the extension of the eligibility      period to May 31, 2010.</li>
<li><em>Assess Prior Terminations</em>. Identify covered employees (and their qualified beneficiaries)      who became eligible for COBRA on or after April 1, 2010, and before April      15, 2010, as well as their COBRA elections. Provide an updated COBRA      notice to these individuals that includes a description of the extended      eligibility period and the special election period. Identify those      employees and beneficiaries in the group whose qualifying event is the      employee’s involuntary termination of employment and who are eligible for      the COBRA subsidy.</li>
<li><em>Continue to Monitor Reduced      Hours AEIs</em>. Plan administrators should      continue to identify any Reduced Hours AEIs, and provide a new notice to      them upon involuntary termination. An individual in this group may be      eligible for the special election period if, upon a reduction in hours the      individual did not elect, or elected and later discontinued, COBRA.</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;"><em>Stay Tuned</em>. Two separate bills in Congress propose to further      extend the COBRA subsidy eligibility period through June 30, 2010, or year      end.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/04/cobra-update-again/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>COBRA Update, Again&#8230;</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/04/cobra-update-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Details on the new HIRE Act signed by President Obama</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/details-on-the-new-hire-act-signed-by-president-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/details-on-the-new-hire-act-signed-by-president-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Advice & Counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment benefits legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redding Red Bluff Chico Employment Law Attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama recently signed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment  (HIRE) Act, containing more than $17 Billion in tax credits designed to  stimulate employment. The Act also includes $20 Billion for highway and transit  infrastructure programs as well. One of the most important provisions for  businesses is a tax credit for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">President Obama recently signed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment  (HIRE) Act, containing more than $17 Billion in tax credits designed to  stimulate employment. The Act also includes $20 Billion for highway and transit  infrastructure programs as well. One of the most important provisions for  businesses is a tax credit for hiring from the ranks of the  unemployed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Under the Act, when an employer hires a “qualified employee” the employer is excused  from paying the normal Social Security match of 6.2% of the wages in 2010. What is a qualified employee you ask? A qualifying employee is one who</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li> is hired  after Feb. 3, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2011;</li>
<li>is not hired to replace  another employee;</li>
<li>is not related to the employer;</li>
<li>and certifies under  penalty of perjury that he or she has not been employed for more than 40  hours during the 60-day period ending on the date that employment  begins with the new employer.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This incentive can save the employer over $6,000 annually for each qualified employee that is hired. Under certain circumstances, the employer who hires a new employee, and retains their services for 52 weeks, may also be able to receive an additional tax credit available on the 2011 tax return equal to the lesser of $1,000 or 6.2% of the wages paid  to an employee for those 52 weeks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These tax incentives are meant to spur job creation, especially for  small businesses who are undecided about whether to begin to ramp up expansion efforts in light of recent economic challenges.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here is the <a href="http://waysandmeans.house.gov/press/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=11080" target="_blank">press release</a> from the Ways &amp; Means Committee Chair describing this bill.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/details-on-the-new-hire-act-signed-by-president-obama/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Details on the new HIRE Act signed by President Obama</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/details-on-the-new-hire-act-signed-by-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COBRA subsidy to continue</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/01/cobra-subsidy-to-continue/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/01/cobra-subsidy-to-continue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Advice & Counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Leave & Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment benefits legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you know, when an employee is terminated the employee may be eligible to continue their participation in the company sponsored health plan through what is often referred to as COBRA.  COBRA is a federal law that allows workers who leave their jobs to continue their former employer&#8217;s health insurance coverage for up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">As many of you know, when an employee is terminated the employee may be eligible to continue their participation in the company sponsored health plan through what is often referred to as COBRA.  COBRA is a federal law that allows workers who leave their jobs to continue their former employer&#8217;s health insurance coverage for up to 18 months. Ordinarily, though, individuals must pay the entire premium, plus an administrative fee, making COBRA unaffordable for many unemployed workers. The economic stimulus package enacted in February 2009 subsidized 65% of COBRA premiums for workers laid off between September 1,  2008, and December  31, 2009. This legislation required employers to pay the 65% subsidy and then reclaim those dollars through a quarterly tax credit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Recently, however, the government signed the Defense Department’s 2010 appropriations bill (“2010 DOD Act”) that will allow laid-off workers to receive subsidized COBRA premiums for up to 15 months, which previously expired after 9 months.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) has released a <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/fscobrapremiumreduction.html">fact sheet</a> explaining how the 2010 DOD Act extends the COBRA subsidy enacted during the earlier economic stimulus package. In general, the 2010 DOD Act extended the COBRA premium reduction eligibility period for two months, through February  28, 2010 and increased the maximum period for receiving the subsidy from 9 to 15 months.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Also, the fact sheet reviews the eligibility requirements for the subsidy, the new period of coverage, and notice requirements that plan administrators must provide. The fact sheet explains that plan administrators are now required to provide notice about the changes made to the COBRA premium subsidy provisions to individuals who have already been provided a COBRA election notice, unless the election notice included the updated premium reduction information. The notices must be given to eligible individuals by February  17, 2010. Individuals who have been terminated on or after October  31, 2009 and will lose health coverage must be provided this notice “within the normal timeframes for providing continuation coverage notices.” Those who had reached the end of the reduced premium period before the legislation extended it to 15 months must be provided this notice within 60 days of the last day they were eligible to receive COBRA premium assistance under the old rules.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/01/cobra-subsidy-to-continue/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>COBRA subsidy to continue</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/01/cobra-subsidy-to-continue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC&#8217;s Final Rules for Title II of Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) Expected Soon</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/12/eeocs-final-rules-for-title-ii-of-genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-gina-expected-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/12/eeocs-final-rules-for-title-ii-of-genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-gina-expected-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Leave & Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employmnet Advice & Counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA GINA FEHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment benefits legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title II GINA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellness Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post provides an update for an earlier post on the use of incentives in wellness programs. The EEOC&#8217;s final rules interpreting Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) had been anticipated in November, but the EEOC now intends to issue a final rule on  this month, according to its Semiannual Regulatory Agenda [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more">This post provides an update for an earlier <a href="http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=68" target="_blank">post </a>on the use of incentives in wellness programs. The EEOC&#8217;s final rules interpreting </span><span id="more">Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) </span><span id="more">had been anticipated in November, but the EEOC now intends to issue a final rule on  this month, </span>according to its <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/public/ContentViewer?objectId=0900006480a64d69&amp;disposition=attachment&amp;contentType=pdf">Semiannual Regulatory Agenda</a> (pdf) released online yesterday.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Title II of GINA, which prohibits genetic information discrimination in employment, took effect on November 21, 2009. The regulation applies to employers with more than 15 employees.<em> </em>Under Title II it is illegal to discriminate against employees or applicants because of genetic information. Title II of GINA prohibits the use of genetic information in making employment decisions, restricts acquisition of genetic information by employers and other entities covered by Title II, and strictly limits the disclosure of genetic information.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The EEOC enforces Title II of GINA (dealing with genetic discrimination in employment). The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and the Treasury have responsibility for issuing regulations for Title I of GINA, which addresses the use of genetic information in health insurance.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/12/eeocs-final-rules-for-title-ii-of-genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-gina-expected-soon/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>EEOC&#8217;s Final Rules for Title II of Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) Expected Soon</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/12/eeocs-final-rules-for-title-ii-of-genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-gina-expected-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legilstaive Update: Governor Vetos Several Employment Bills</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/10/legilstaive-update-governor-vetos-several-employment-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/10/legilstaive-update-governor-vetos-several-employment-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california employement law attorney wage and hour redding red bluff chico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed several employment-related bills, which was a positive development for employers.  The California Legislature had passed the following bills and sent them to the Governor for signature:  (1) AB 335, which would have prohibited forum selection and choice of law clauses in employment agreements, if the clauses provided for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Earlier this week, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed several employment-related bills, which was a positive development for employers.  The California Legislature had passed the following bills and sent them to the Governor for signature:  (1) AB 335, which would have prohibited forum selection and choice of law clauses in employment agreements, if the clauses provided for a forum other than California or the law of a state other than California for resolution of disputes between a California employee and the employer; (2) AB 943, which would have prohibited employers in most instances from obtaining credit reports for use in hiring decisions; (3) AB 793, which would have increased the statute of limitations and recovery period for compensation-related claims; and (4) AB 527, which would have created a presumption in Labor Commissioner proceedings that all pay records relating to the claim would be presumed false if the Labor Commissioner found that two or more records for any pay period were falsified.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/10/legilstaive-update-governor-vetos-several-employment-bills/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Legilstaive Update: Governor Vetos Several Employment Bills</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2009/10/legilstaive-update-governor-vetos-several-employment-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

