<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Business &#38; Employment Law Blog &#187; small business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/category/small-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Northern California&#039;s Source for Business and Employment News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ten Legal Pitfalls Startups Should Avoid</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2011/07/ten-legal-pitfalls-startups-should-avoid/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2011/07/ten-legal-pitfalls-startups-should-avoid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Advice & Counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business entity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Labor Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitfalls for business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good summary article for any new business owner, or those thinking of starting a business. It lays out the top 10 legal pitfalls you should strive to avoid when starting a new venture.  It was written by Mark Britton and posted on Fox&#8217; Small Business Center web page this morning:
The etymology of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good summary article for any new business owner, or those thinking of starting a business. It lays out the top 10 legal pitfalls you should strive to avoid when starting a new venture.  It was written by Mark Britton and posted on Fox&#8217; Small Business Center web page this morning:</p>
<p>The etymology of the word “entrepreneur” is well established. Since the earliest of French times, it has meant “someone who breaks into hives when coming within 20 feet of a lawyer.”</p>
<p>While I’m joking regarding the word’s origins, I’m quite serious (albeit figurative) regarding the entrepreneurial response to lawyers. Most young entrepreneurs see themselves as an unrivaled visionary and the last thing they need is some old dude in a three-piece pulling on the handbrake.</p>
<p>Until something else does.</p>
<p>Nothing will grind the entrepreneurial party train to a halt faster than a big lawsuit, nasty contract dispute or some other legal circus animal that no one bothered to stop from coming on board. The lawyer-averse entrepreneur suddenly finds himself begging for a hug from the old dude.</p>
<p>So, before you need to beg for that hug, here are 10 pitfalls that often cause startups legal trouble. A penny of legal proactivity in each of these areas will offer a pound of protection as your business matures.</p>
<p><strong>1.   Not Hiring a Startup Lawyer:</strong><strong> </strong>There are a lot of lawyers that represent small businesses, but there are only a few that regularly represent startups–particularly when it comes to fundraising from sophisticated angels and venture capitalists. There is a “market” around angel and VC funding and if your lawyer is not immersed in that market you can get fleeced.</p>
<p><strong>2.   Not Having Founders’ Agreements:</strong> How do you split the equity pie? Who contributes what? Who acts as CEO? What if a founder stops performing? There are so many questions that founders never think through because everything is going to be “awesome.” However, when cash and humans are involved, things are seldom uniformly awesome.</p>
<p><strong>3.   Choosing the Wrong Corporate Entity:</strong> While this sounds mundane, it is actually quite important. Whether you want to run your business as a C Corp, S Corp, LLC, LP etc. is wholly dependent on your long-term objectives. Different structures offer different opportunities and restrictions, and changing your structure years later is administratively painful and expensive.</p>
<p><strong>4.   Using Someone Else’s Trade Name:</strong><strong> </strong>Many entrepreneurs will lock on a company name without researching whether someone else owns that name. They will put up a web site, print a bunch of advertising collateral, and then they get a letter from some Malaysian conglomerate that says, “Quit using our name and pay us $1 million in damages.”</p>
<p><strong>5.   Comingling Accounts:</strong> When money first starts coming in – either from investors or sales–it is easy to mix personal and business accounts. Don’t do it. The more you do, the more that someone can pursue your personal assets for any unpaid corporate liabilities.</p>
<p><strong>6.   Failing to Protect Intellectual Property:</strong> Most great ideas are supported by a product or process that should be patented. If you are telling people all about your idea without a NDA or a patent application on file, you run the risk that your great idea will soon be your competitor’s great idea. Identify your core pieces of intellectual property and patent them.</p>
<p><strong>7.   Failing to Have Adequate Employee Agreements</strong>: While these are less extensive than the founders’ agreements, you need at least a standard agreement in place for all of your employees and consultants that covers confidentiality, ownership of things they develop, etc. The agreement will not feel that important early on, but it will come in handy when your first employee is hijacked by a competitor.</p>
<p><strong>8.   Failing to Check for Employee Agreements</strong>: If you are hiring someone from a company that has followed step No. 7, failing to investigate their former employee agreements can cause problems – especially if you are hiring them for their technical knowhow. If their “knowhow” is owned by their former employer or is blocked by a non-competition agreement, you may be getting less value than you bargained for.</p>
<p><strong>9.   Failing to Comply with Federal or State Securities Laws</strong>: If you are asking even a couple of people for money – whether it is an investment or a loan – you must make sure you are observing the various securities laws. While you may not need to “register” your securities, you may need to file for an “exemption.” An improper offering can lead to regulatory fines and, maybe even worse, unwinding of a transaction.</p>
<p><strong>10. Understand Key Contracts</strong>: If a third-party is important to a core part of your business, you need a contract with that party and you need to understand the core terms of that contract. In a breach-of-contract lawsuit, ignorance is not a defense.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2011/07/ten-legal-pitfalls-startups-should-avoid/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Ten Legal Pitfalls Startups Should Avoid</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2011/07/ten-legal-pitfalls-startups-should-avoid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Court Decision Restricts Union Activity on Private Property</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/california-court-decision-restricts-union-activity-on-private-property/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/california-court-decision-restricts-union-activity-on-private-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employmnet Advice & Counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor code.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscone Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soliciting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent decision by the California Court of Appeal has basically banned unions from picketing on business property within California. In its opinion the court invalidated two California laws designed to protect union demonstrations on business property.  The reviewing court ordered the trial court to grant an injunction restraining the United Food and Commercial Workers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">A recent decision by the California Court of Appeal has basically banned unions from picketing on business property within California. In its opinion the court invalidated two California laws designed to protect union demonstrations on business property.  The reviewing court ordered the trial court to grant an injunction restraining the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (“the Union”) from picketing in front of a Sacramento warehouse store owned by Ralphs Grocery Co. (“Ralphs”). <em>Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Local 8,</em><em> </em>No. C060413 (Cal. Ct. App. July 19, 2010).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Facts: </em></strong>The dispute arose when several members of the Union picketed in front of Food Co., a subsidiary of Ralphs, for being a nonunion store. Ralphs sued for trespass and sought to enjoin the unauthorized picketing after an unsuccessful attempt to require the Union to follow Food Co.’s rules for speech on the property. The rules prohibited, in part, the distribution of literature, physical contact with any person, display of signs larger than two feet by three feet, and speech within 20 feet of the store entrance. Ralphs alleged that the Union didn&#8217;t follow the rules ; specifically, that the Union  was handing out flyers and enlisting supporters within five feet of the entrance.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In bringing suit, Ralphs challenged the constitutionality of California’s Moscone Act, which deprived state courts of jurisdiction to issue injunctions against “peaceful picketing or patrolling” involving any labor dispute. Ralph’s lawsuit also challenged California’s Labor Code section 1131.8, which imposed severe restrictions on a property owner’s right to obtain injunctive relief against union activities. The trial court ruled that the Moscone Act was unconstitutional because it constituted content based discrimination in violation of the First Amendment and Equal Protection Clause. The trial court, however, upheld the constitutionality of California’s Labor Code section 1138.1 in light of a prior appellate decision which held that Labor Code section 1138.1 did not violate federal and state constitutional guarantees of equal protection. Applying Labor Code section 1138.1, the trial court denied Ralphs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Ralphs appealed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Decision: </em></strong>Three questions of law were at issue on appeal:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">1) Is the entrance area of Food Co., where the picketing was taking place, a public or private forum? If public, the California Constitution required that any time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech be reasonable. The court found that Food Co.’s entrance area was not a public forum, so the company was free to restrict the type of speech allowed at its entrance.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">2) Is California&#8217;s Moscone Act, which limited the ability of courts to issue injunctions in labor relations cases, constitutional? The constitutionality of the Moscone Act was at issue because the Act&#8217;s selective restriction was based on the content of the speech. The court held that the Moscone Act was unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments because it afforded preferential treatment to speech concerning labor disputes over speech about other issues.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">3) Is the requirement of California’s Labor Code section 1138.1 that factual showings be made before a court is able to grant an injunction in a labor dispute constitutional (<em>i.e</em>., that unlawful acts have been threatened and will be committed and that substantial and irreparable injury to the property would result)? The court found that this Labor Code section was unconstitutional for the same reasons as that of the Moscone Act.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Stay Tuned: </em></strong>Although the decision may be subject to further appeal, this case provides important guidance for employers dealing with the issue of regulating union activity on business property. The court’s ruling is seen as a major victory for California retailers who have endured loss of business and damage to their image resulting from union picketing on their properties. A wide spectrum of businesses ranging from hospitals to retail chain stores are expected to be impacted by this decision. Employers need to have a firm grasp of what constitutes public and private forums under California law and be able to determine the types of content neutral restrictions that are enforceable on their premises.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/california-court-decision-restricts-union-activity-on-private-property/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>California Court Decision Restricts Union Activity on Private Property</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/california-court-decision-restricts-union-activity-on-private-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government says GDP slows, recession was deeper than previously thought.</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/07/government-says-gdp-slows-recession-was-deeper-than-previously-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/07/government-says-gdp-slows-recession-was-deeper-than-previously-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal writes that the U.S. economy slowed in the second quarter of this year and the government said the recession was deeper than earlier believed, adding to concerns over the recovery&#8217;s strength.  The Commerce Department Friday said U.S. gross domestic product, or the value of all goods and services produced, rose at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703999304575398870021765454.html?mod=djemTMB_h" target="_blank">writes </a>that the U.S. economy slowed in the second quarter of this year and the government said the recession was deeper than earlier believed, adding to concerns over the recovery&#8217;s strength.  The Commerce Department Friday said U.S. gross domestic product, or the value of all goods and services produced, rose at an annualized seasonally adjusted rate of 2.4% in April to June. In its first estimate of the economy&#8217;s benchmark indicator, the government report showed growth was lifted by business investments and exports. Consumer spending, a key growth engine for the U.S. economy, made a smaller contribution to growth.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Economists polled by Dow Jones Newswires were expecting GDP to rise by 2.5% in the second quarter. In the first quarter, the economy grew by 3.7%, revised up from an originally reported 2.7% increase. But growth estimates all the way back to the start of 2007 were revised lower.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">After suffering its worst downturn since the 1930s, the U.S. economy began taking small steps forward about a year ago, helped by the Federal Reserve&#8217;s slashing of lending rates and the government tax cuts. But recent data have raised questions about the recovery&#8217;s durability. The job market remains weak, with almost one in 10 Americans unemployed, and growth in consumer spending and manufacturing appears to be slowing down.  The government revision of data over the past three years showed that the economy&#8217;s exit from its deep slump was weaker than previously estimated. In the final quarter of 2009, for example, GDP rose at an annualized rate of 5.0% as consumer spending didn&#8217;t grow as much as previously thought. The earlier estimate was that GDP increased by 5.6%.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the most recent quarter available, consumer spending rose by a moderate annualized rate of 1.6% in April to June. Spending by Americans, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy, rose by 1.9% in the first three months of the year.  Meantime, business spending on equipment and software continued to surge, increasing by 21.9% in the second quarter, compared with a 20.4% rise in the first three months. The figures highlight the contrast in the economy between high company profits and a persistently feeble jobs market keeping consumers at bay.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who last week said the economy&#8217;s outlook was &#8220;unusually uncertain&#8221;, has stressed the strength of the recovery will depend on whether consumers spend and companies invest enough to make up for fading support from the government. With unemployment still at 9.5% and Americans worried that taxes will need to rise to cut a huge budget deficit, that remains in doubt. When they meet Aug. 10, Fed officials are widely expected to repeat they see interest rates staying close to zero for a while and are likely to at least discuss ways in which they could support the economy further. A Fed official Thursday warned that deflation is a growing risk for the economy.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Economic growth in the U.S. during the second quarter slowed to 2.4%, indicating that the recovery has been weaker than previously expected. David Wessel, Dennis Berman and Evan Newmark discuss. Also, Dennis Berman tells the story about one of the leaders at Tiananmen Square who is now one of the top candidates to manage Berkshire Hathaway&#8217;s investment portfolio.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In a sign of the economy&#8217;s weakness, Friday&#8217;s report showed price increases continued to move down in the second quarter from already low levels.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The underlying inflation rate &#8212; which excludes volatile moves in food and energy prices and is closely watched by the Fed &#8212; increased by 1.1% in the April-to-June period from the previous quarter. That was the lowest reading of the core personal consumption expenditure index since the first three months of 2009 and came after a 1.2% rise in the first quarter of this year.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Other inflation gauges within the government&#8217;s report were also muted. The overall price index for personal consumption expenditures rose by only 0.1% in the second quarter, slowing sharply from a 2.1% gain in the first quarter. Gross domestic purchase prices rose just 0.1%, after a 2.1% increase in the first quarter. The chain-weighted GDP price index increased by 1.8%, compared to 1.0% in the first three months.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For all of 2009, the government said the U.S. economy contracted by 2.6%, compared to the previously estimated 2.4% decline. In the whole of 2008, GDP was flat, instead of rising 0.4% as previously estimated. In 2007, the world&#8217;s largest economy expanded by 2.1%, down from an originally reported 1.9% increase.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/07/government-says-gdp-slows-recession-was-deeper-than-previously-thought/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Government says GDP slows, recession was deeper than previously thought.</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/07/government-says-gdp-slows-recession-was-deeper-than-previously-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Business Owners May be Eligible for Health Care Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post by Sarah Needleman of the Wall Street Journal, she points out a new tax credit that may be available to small business owners who pay for health insurance for their employees:
Uncle Sam wants small-business  owners to take notice of a new health-care tax credit &#8212; one of the  first provisions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In this post by Sarah Needleman of the Wall Street Journal, she points out a new tax credit that may be available to small business owners who pay for health insurance for their employees:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Uncle Sam wants small-business  owners to take notice of a new health-care tax credit &#8212; one of the  first provisions of the recently enacted health-reform law to go into  effect.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Last week, the Internal Revenue Service  announced that it&#8217;s sending postcards to more than four million small  businesses urging them to check if they qualify for the tax break. It&#8217;s  being offered in two phases, with the first worth up to 35% of  qualifying businesses&#8217; premium health-care costs for tax years 2010  through 2013. The rate increases to 50% in 2014. The maximum length of  potential coverage for qualifying employers is six taxable years: four  years under the first phase and two years under the second.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In general, to be eligible for the tax credit, businesses must cover  at least 50% of the cost of health-care coverage for some of their  workers, employ fewer than the equivalent of 25 full-time workers and  pay average annual wages below $50,000. The IRS says the tax break is  designed to encourage smaller businesses – which are not mandated by  2014 to provide health care, unlike companies with more than 50  employees – to offer health coverage to their low- and moderate-income  workers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Tammy Rostov, owner of Rostov&#8217;s Coffee &amp; Tea in Richmond, Va.,  says she received the IRS&#8217;s postcard and expects her small retail  business to be eligible for the credit. She offers health coverage to  her five full-time employees and pays 100% of the premium, an amount  that she says has increased by more than 200% over the past six years.  She describes the tax credit as a welcome relief. &#8220;It&#8217;s a step in the  right direction,&#8221; she says.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But other qualifying business owners are less enthusiastic, arguing  that the tax break won&#8217;t make a significant impact on their bottom  lines.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Pascal Helou, owner of Globotron LLC, a technology-consulting company  in New York, says affording health insurance for his three employees is  a non-issue given that he&#8217;s struggling these days just to stay in  business. Since 2007, he says sales have declined 30% every year and his  firm now has four clients, down from 15.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;For my business, this type of tax credit will not make a  difference,&#8221; says Mr. Helou, adding that he has yet to receive the IRS&#8217;s  postcard about it. &#8220;The real issue is the amount of business we&#8217;re  getting. Nobody&#8217;s willing to spend money&#8221; on technology-consulting  services.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Meanwhile, there are also some entrepreneurs who don&#8217;t believe the  government should provide financial incentives for small businesses to  offer health coverage to workers in the first place.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Jim Fab, owner of Fab Electric Inc., an electrical contractor  business in Gaithersburg, Md., falls into this camp. Providing health  insurance and other benefits to his 18 employees, he says, is &#8220;hopefully  what separates me from the electrical contractor that doesn&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some small businesses appear to be left without any government aide  under the new piece of health-reform legislation. These include  organizations with between 25 and 50 employees and ones with less than  25 employees but payrolls that average $50,000 or more.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Tracy Betts, says her Springfield, Va., Web-design business, Balance  Technology Group Inc., doesn&#8217;t qualify for the credit. While she employs  the equivalent of eight full-time workers, their salaries&#8217; average  $71,000. &#8220;For me, it&#8217;s all about the programmers, and I can&#8217;t hire  anyone for less than $90,000 (in annual pay),&#8221; she says.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Ms. Betts says a year and half ago she told her staff she could only  afford to offer them either health-care coverage or a retirement-savings  plan with a matching contribution from the company. All but one chose  the latter benefit, she says.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Small Business Owners May be Eligible for Health Care Tax Credit</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/small-business-owners-may-be-eligible-for-health-care-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industries Poised for Growth</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/industries-poised-for-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/industries-poised-for-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Smart Money article by Diana Ransom posted at the Wall Street Journal web page discusses several future growth industries.
Much has been said about the Obama administration pushing through new  regulations on everything from health-care companies to banks — not to  mention the impact these changes will have on the overall economy. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">This Smart Money <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471204575210023871636874.html?mod=djemSB_h" target="_blank">article </a>by Diana Ransom posted at the Wall Street Journal web page discusses several future growth industries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Much has been said about the Obama administration pushing through new  regulations on everything from health-care companies to banks — not to  mention the impact these changes will have on the overall economy. But  less attention has been paid to the way the new regulations will play  out for entrepreneurs: Will stepped-up regulation stifle or stimulate  growth? SmartMoney spoke with business owners, venture capitalists and  analysts for a snapshot of six industries poised for growth.</p>
<h3>Telecommunications</h3>
<p>Even though shares of  telecom giant <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=VZ">Verizon Communications</a> and  its Finnish counterpart <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=NOK">Nokia</a> fell last week after  reporting lackluster first-quarter results, there may be wind in their  sails yet, says Drew Clark, director of strategy for <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=IBM">IBM</a>&#8217;s Venture Capital Group  in San Mateo, Calif. One boost may come from the president&#8217;s National  Broadband Plan, a program that aims to increase access to mobile  broadband and support a nationwide public safety wireless broadband  network. These firms, along with others, will likely benefit, says  Clark. Per the Obama administration&#8217;s 2009 stimulus package, the  government plans to spend $7.2 billion on the nation&#8217;s broadband  projects.</p>
<h3>Hosted Services</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Perhaps the greatest beneficiaries of the  president&#8217;s broadband agenda are the small companies that will have  better access to faster web channels. FlexiSphere, a Hawthorne, N.Y.,  firm, offers financial services firms so-called cloud computing —  technology that allows firms to share the server of a larger company via  the Internet. As the nation&#8217;s infrastructure improves, so will access  to the company&#8217;s products and services, says Tom Saleh, the company&#8217;s  founder and CEO. &#8220;Cloud computing is all about better, faster, cheaper,&#8221;  he says, adding that this is just a first step. &#8220;Cloud computing is  doing for computing what the Internet did for communications,&#8221; Saleh  says.</p>
<h3>Information Technology</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So far, the  government hasn&#8217;t suggested the need to further regulate the information  technology field, giving these firms a distinct advantage. That&#8217;s  because the uncertainty surrounding regulatory reforms can both stymie a  small company&#8217;s ability to make decisions and trigger a pullback in  investment. In the first quarter of 2010, the IT industry raised $1.5  billion for 192 deals &#8212; the most of any other industry tracked by Dow  Jones VentureSource, a research firm owned by <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=NWS">News Corp.</a>, which also  publishes SmartMoney.com and The Wall Street Journal.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Further, there&#8217;s a lot of pent-up demand for technology, says Karl  Mills, the president and chief investment officer for Jurika Mills &amp;  Keifer, an independent investment advisory firm in Oakland, Calif. &#8220;Old  inventory of technology gets written off quick when it becomes  obsolete. However, during the downturn, many consumers and businesses  put off buying new equipment,&#8221; he says. Plus, many of the larger  companies in this arena, which often scoop up their smaller brethren,  are well capitalized. &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=MSFT">Microsoft</a> could write a  check and bail out Greece,&#8221; Mills says.</p>
<h3>Media, Content Production</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">With that enhanced infrastructure,  other beneficiaries include media companies and other content providers,  which have struggled in recent years thanks to a precipitous drop in  advertising revenues, says Sal Tirabassi, a partner at M/C Venture  Partners in Boston. Between downloading movies and watching TV online at  home or on a web-enabled mobile device, consumers&#8217; appetites for  content will likely expand, as will advertising opportunities.  &#8220;Advertisers are increasing their budgets slightly again,&#8221; he says.  &#8220;There will be a bit of a rebound there.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Health Care</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Thanks to federal and state stimulus dollars, the  health-care infrastructure in the U.S. is about to get a triple bypass.  Not only does the government plan to plow $20 billion into  computerizing health records, the angel investment community has taken  an interest in the sector. In 2009, health-care services, medical  devices and equipment attracted 17% of total angel investment dollars,  or nearly $3 billion, according to the Center for Venture Research at  the University of New Hampshire. &#8220;We&#8217;re seeing a lot of companies come  through here with technology solutions for innovating medical records,&#8221;  says Michelle Murcia, the chief financial officer of TechColumbus, a  business incubator and venture firm in Columbus, Ohio. &#8220;Health care IT  is a huge growth area.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Clean Energy</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The U.S. Energy Information Administration  projects that global energy consumption will jump 33% between 2010 and  2030. This added demand, combined with a mix of venture-capital  investment and $43 billion in federal stimulus spending bodes well for  businesses that make everything from solar panels and wind turbines to  electricity grids and batteries, says Clark from IBM.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In addition, the government recently sweetened the tax incentives and  subsidies for homeowners and businesses to install solar and other  forms of energy-saving equipment. &#8220;Despite the fact that we&#8217;ve been in  one of the worst recessions in decades, business in the industry has  grown,&#8221; says David Kaltsas, president of SunWize Technologies&#8217; systems  group, a solar-panel installation and sales firm in Kingston, N.Y.,  which recently launched an installation franchise program. &#8220;Last year  was tough, but we&#8217;ve since grown double-digits in our  direct-installation business.&#8221;</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/industries-poised-for-growth/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Industries Poised for Growth</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/05/industries-poised-for-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell Spurs Sales by Lending to Hard-Hit Small Businesses</title>
		<link>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/dell-spurs-sales-by-lending-to-hard-hit-small-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/dell-spurs-sales-by-lending-to-hard-hit-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn McCammon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business start up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin Scheck of the Wall St. Journal writes that &#8220;for years, Dell Inc. has relied on  sales to small businesses for a big chunk of its revenue. It sells more  personal computers to small companies than any tech supplier. Now, it is  offering more credit to spur small business purchases.&#8221;
He goes on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Justin Scheck of the Wall St. Journal writes that &#8220;for years, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=DELL">Dell</a> Inc. has relied on  sales to small businesses for a big chunk of its revenue. It sells more  personal computers to small companies than any tech supplier. Now, it is  offering more credit to spur small business purchases.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">He goes on to note that &#8220;The financing strategy is showing promise. Its small-and-medium-business  division posted a 10% gain in revenue in the company&#8217;s fiscal fourth  quarter ended Jan. 29 from the same period last year, versus an 11% gain  for the company as a whole. Operating-profit rose 17% from the same  quarter last year to $282 million, surpassing the $281 million in  operating profit from Dell&#8217;s large-business unit, which posted an 8.4%  rise from last year.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You can read the entire article <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304370304575151883563037548.html?mod=djemSB_h" target="_blank">here</a>, and check out Dell&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dell.com/" target="_blank">page </a>to see if anything interests you! A market snapshot on Dell <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=DELL" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<a href='http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/dell-spurs-sales-by-lending-to-hard-hit-small-businesses/' class='retweet vert' startCount = '0'>Dell Spurs Sales by Lending to Hard-Hit Small Businesses</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reddingbusinessandemploymentlawblog.com/2010/03/dell-spurs-sales-by-lending-to-hard-hit-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

